logo
pagesback-cover
185
Reddit meter
all mentions

The Big Myth

576 pages, 2023

Takeaways
Description

With startling archival evidence, Naomi Oreskes and Erik Conway document the campaigns of the past to rewrite textbooks, combat unions, and defend child labor. They detail the ploys that turned hardline economists Friedrich von Hayek and Milton Friedman into household names; recount the libertarian roots of the Little House on the Prairie books; and tune into the General Electric-sponsored TV show that beamed free-market doctrine to millions and launched Ronald Reagan's political career.

Understanding the Concept of Scientific Consensus

In The Big Myth, Naomi Oreskes explores the concept of scientific consensus. She explains how it's not just about agreement among scientists, but also about the robustness of the evidence. This is a great chance for you to dig into the world of science and understand how consensus is reached.

The Role of Doubt in Science

Oreskes takes a deep look into the role of doubt in science. She explains that doubt is an essential part of the scientific process, but it can also be manipulated to undermine scientific consensus. This book will help you see the difference between healthy skepticism and destructive doubt.

The Impact of Corporate Interests on Science

The Big Myth also explores the impact of corporate interests on science. Oreskes shows how corporations can distort scientific findings to serve their own interests. This is a must-read if you want to understand the complex relationship between science and business.

The Importance of Public Understanding of Science

Naomi Oreskes emphasizes the importance of public understanding of science. She argues that a well-informed public is crucial for making sound policy decisions. Check out this book to find out why science literacy matters.

The Dangers of Science Denial

In The Big Myth, Oreskes warns about the dangers of science denial. She explains how denying scientific consensus can lead to harmful consequences. This book will make you think twice about the importance of trusting scientific research.